Chroniclecraze.blogspot.com
 |
| MohammedBinSalman |
Meta Description: Houthi rebels have seized Yemen’s Red Sea coastline including Mocha, advancing toward the Bab al-Mandab Strait. Saudi Arabia’s two urgent calls to Trump for military aid were rejected. Why did the US turn its back on its closest Gulf ally?
Introduction: The Chokepoint That Could Break the World EconomyThere is a narrow stretch of water between Yemen and the Horn of Africa where the fate of global trade hangs by a thread. The Bab al-Mandab Strait—the “Gate of Tears”—is one of the most important maritime passages on Earth, a vital artery connecting the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden, and from there, to the Suez Canal and the markets of Europe.
Right now, that artery is under threat. And the kingdom of Saudi Arabia, which has spent more than a decade trying to keep it safe, has found itself standing largely alone.
In a dramatic escalation that has stunned the region, Houthi rebels have captured the strategic Red Sea port city of Mocha and are now advancing toward the Hanish Islands and the strait itself. Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman reportedly called President Donald Trump twice in a matter of hours, pleading for American support. The response, according to multiple sources, was a firm refusal.
The question echoing through Riyadh, Washington, and every capital with a stake in global energy security is simple: Why did America abandon its closest Gulf ally at the moment of greatest need?
The Fall of Mocha: A Retreat That Shocked the Region
The collapse came with startling speed. According to reports from Yemeni media, Houthi forces advanced through the districts of Hays and Al-Khawkhah in southern Al-Hudaydah province before pushing into Mocha, a historic port city located roughly 70 kilometres north of the Bab al-Mandab Strait. Government forces aligned with the internationally recognised Yemeni government withdrew south toward Lahej province, offering little resistance.
The symbolism could hardly be starker. Mocha was once the world’s coffee capital, the port that gave the world its beloved beverage. Today, it is a military prize of immense strategic value. It was the last major Red Sea port held by the Saudi-backed government, and its fall means the Houthis now control virtually the entire Yemeni coastline along the Red Sea.
The offensive was part of an 18-hour operation that saw Houthi fighters sweep down the coast, capturing Dhubab and Murad—the final government-held coastal towns—before advancing offshore to seize Mayyun Island in the Bab al-Mandab Strait itself. Fighting was reported on Zuqar Island, another strategic outpost in the strait.
A local government official confirmed to Agence France-Presse that boats carrying armed Houthi fighters had reached the island, and eyewitnesses described armed men deploying along the shore of the strait in military vehicles.
Saudi Arabia’s Two Phone Calls: A Plea Met With a Wall
The diplomatic drama unfolded on September 10. According to Axios, citing two US officials, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman first called President Trump to describe the deteriorating situation—the withdrawal of allied Yemeni forces in the face of the Houthi advance. Hours later, he called again, this time with a direct request: American airstrikes against the Houthis.
Trump rejected the request.
According to sources familiar with the matter, the president’s instruction was clear: the US military should focus on Iran and the Strait of Hormuz, and avoid opening a new combat theatre. The White House conveyed to Riyadh that Washington was not willing to take direct military action for now.
The response was not entirely empty. The US agreed to provide intelligence sharing and targeting data, supplementing the approximately 200 American military personnel already stationed in the kingdom for advisory and liaison duties. Admiral Brad Cooper, commander of US Central Command, was dispatched to Saudi Arabia for urgent consultations.
But for Riyadh, intelligence alone was not what it needed. It needed bombs. It needed American firepower. And it did not get it.
Why Trump Said No: Iran, Hormuz, and the Shadow of Midterms
The refusal was not born of indifference. It was born of calculation.
The United States is currently in its seventh month of a war with Iran, a conflict that has effectively closed the Strait of Hormuz—through which a fifth of the world’s oil once flowed. With Saudi Arabia, the world’s largest oil exporter, now relying heavily on the Red Sea route, the potential loss of Bab al-Mandab as well represents a nightmare scenario: a double chokepoint crisis that could send oil prices spiralling and cripple the global economy.
Yet Trump’s strategic calculus appears to be that opening a second front against the Houthis would stretch American resources too thin. The Houthis are not a conventional military force. They have spent years building up ground troops, air-defence systems, ballistic missiles, and drones—much of it with Iranian support. A direct US campaign against them would be costly, drawn-out, and could inflame the broader region at precisely the wrong moment.
There is also a domestic dimension. The war with Iran has driven up global oil prices and American gasoline costs, sending the president’s approval ratings to record lows ahead of November’s midterm elections. A new military entanglement in Yemen is the last thing the White House wants on the evening news.
As one US official put it, the administration’s approach is to “empower our regional partners to take the lead in managing and resolving regional security challenges”. In practice, that means Saudi Arabia is expected to fight its own battles.
The Houthi Military Machine: No Longer a Ragtag Militia
The speed of the Houthi advance has exposed uncomfortable truths about the balance of power in Yemen. What was once dismissed as a ragtag rebel group is now a formidable military force capable of launching coordinated coastal offensives, seizing islands, and threatening one of the world’s most critical maritime corridors.
Mohamad Elmasry, a professor at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, noted that the Houthis’ ability to capture and hold Mocha demonstrates how their military strength has grown in recent years. “They have developed strong ground forces and obtained Iranian weapons, air-defence systems, and a substantial arsenal of missiles and drones,” he said.
Crucially, Elmasry argued that the Houthis are not simply Iranian puppets. “They have their own national cause, their own civil war independent of whatever happens in Iran,” he said. This distinction matters. It means that even if a wider US-Iran conflict were resolved, the Houthi threat to Saudi Arabia and Red Sea shipping would not automatically disappear.
The Houthis have also demonstrated their reach beyond Yemen’s borders. On September 8, they claimed responsibility for a large-scale missile and drone attack on Saudi Aramco facilities in Abha, Najran, and Jazan, as well as King Khalid Air Base. Saudi authorities reported 73 injuries and fires at energy facilities that forced temporary suspensions of operations.
Global Trade at Risk: The Numbers That Should Terrify Markets
The Bab al-Mandab Strait is not just a strategic footnote. It is a lifeline.
Millions of barrels of oil pass through it every day. It is the primary alternative route for Middle Eastern oil now that Hormuz is largely closed. The Suez Canal, which depends on traffic through Bab al-Mandab, is a cornerstone of Egypt’s economy. Global supply chains—already fragile after years of pandemic disruption and geopolitical turmoil—depend on this narrow passage remaining open.
The Houthis have stated that international navigation through the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab remains “safe and regular,” and that their operations are “defensive” in nature. But they have also maintained a naval blockade on Saudi shipping announced in July, and have attacked Saudi oil tankers.
The gap between reassurance and reality is where fear lives. Markets react to uncertainty, and there is plenty of that. Any sustained disruption at Bab al-Mandab would force ships to take the far longer route around the Cape of Good Hope, adding weeks to journeys and millions to costs.
International Reaction: Condemnation Without Consequence
The international response has followed a familiar pattern: swift condemnation, followed by little action.
Saudi Ambassador to the UN Abdulaziz Alwasil told the Security Council that the kingdom would take “all necessary measures” in response to Houthi attacks. The Saudi-led coalition spokesperson described the recent strikes as a “dangerous escalation”.
UN Special Envoy for Yemen Hans Grundberg called the renewed hostilities “an extremely alarming development” and urged all parties to exercise maximum restraint.
The European Union condemned the attacks on civilian and economic sites. India and Pakistan expressed concern about threats to navigation. But beyond words, the international community has offered little in the way of concrete support for Saudi Arabia’s military position.
The Houthi Military Machine: No Longer a Ragtag Militia
The speed of the Houthi advance has exposed uncomfortable truths about the balance of power in Yemen. What was once dismissed as a ragtag rebel group is now a formidable military force capable of launching coordinated coastal offensives, seizing islands, and threatening one of the world’s most critical maritime corridors.
Mohamad Elmasry, a professor at the Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, noted that the Houthis’ ability to capture and hold Mocha demonstrates how their military strength has grown in recent years. “They have developed strong ground forces and obtained Iranian weapons, air-defence systems, and a substantial arsenal of missiles and drones,” he said.
Crucially, Elmasry argued that the Houthis are not simply Iranian puppets. “They have their own national cause, their own civil war independent of whatever happens in Iran,” he said. This distinction matters. It means that even if a wider US-Iran conflict were resolved, the Houthi threat to Saudi Arabia and Red Sea shipping would not automatically disappear.
The Houthis have also demonstrated their reach beyond Yemen’s borders. On September 8, they claimed responsibility for a large-scale missile and drone attack on Saudi Aramco facilities in Abha, Najran, and Jazan, as well as King Khalid Air Base. Saudi authorities reported 73 injuries and fires at energy facilities that forced temporary suspensions of operations.
Global Trade at Risk: The Numbers That Should Terrify Markets
The Bab al-Mandab Strait is not just a strategic footnote. It is a lifeline.
Millions of barrels of oil pass through it every day. It is the primary alternative route for Middle Eastern oil now that Hormuz is largely closed. The Suez Canal, which depends on traffic through Bab al-Mandab, is a cornerstone of Egypt’s economy. Global supply chains—already fragile after years of pandemic disruption and geopolitical turmoil—depend on this narrow passage remaining open.
The Houthis have stated that international navigation through the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab remains “safe and regular,” and that their operations are “defensive” in nature. But they have also maintained a naval blockade on Saudi shipping announced in July, and have attacked Saudi oil tankers.
The gap between reassurance and reality is where fear lives. Markets react to uncertainty, and there is plenty of that. Any sustained disruption at Bab al-Mandab would force ships to take the far longer route around the Cape of Good Hope, adding weeks to journeys and millions to costs.
International Reaction: Condemnation Without Consequence
The international response has followed a familiar pattern: swift condemnation, followed by little action.
Saudi Ambassador to the UN Abdulaziz Alwasil told the Security Council that the kingdom would take “all necessary measures” in response to Houthi attacks. The Saudi-led coalition spokesperson described the recent strikes as a “dangerous escalation”.
UN Special Envoy for Yemen Hans Grundberg called the renewed hostilities “an extremely alarming development” and urged all parties to exercise maximum restraint.
The European Union condemned the attacks on civilian and economic sites. India and Pakistan expressed concern about threats to navigation. But beyond words, the international community has offered little in the way of concrete support for Saudi Arabia’s military position.
Conclusion: A Dangerous New Phase
The fall of Mocha and the advance toward Bab al-Mandab mark the most serious escalation in Yemen since the 2022 truce. It is a moment that tests alliances, exposes vulnerabilities, and raises uncomfortable questions about the future of security in the Red Sea.
For Saudi Arabia, the lesson is stark: even your closest allies may not come when you call. For the United States, the gamble is that avoiding a new front now will not lead to a far greater crisis later. For the Houthis, the prize is control of one of the world’s most vital chokepoints—and the leverage that comes with it.
And for the rest of the world, the message is simple: the Gate of Tears is not just a poetic name. It is a warning.
The fall of Mocha and the advance toward Bab al-Mandab mark the most serious escalation in Yemen since the 2022 truce. It is a moment that tests alliances, exposes vulnerabilities, and raises uncomfortable questions about the future of security in the Red Sea.
For Saudi Arabia, the lesson is stark: even your closest allies may not come when you call. For the United States, the gamble is that avoiding a new front now will not lead to a far greater crisis later. For the Houthis, the prize is control of one of the world’s most vital chokepoints—and the leverage that comes with it.
And for the rest of the world, the message is simple: the Gate of Tears is not just a poetic name. It is a warning.
No comments:
Post a Comment